Written on Friday, January 17, 2014 by Jose Sanchez Marquez
The following information was the result of a Project conducted at Concordia University, Montreál, Canada called.
Use of Non-destructive Tests for Quality Assurance in Portland Cement Concretes (PCC) Pavements.
by,Matin Nabavi, Reza Mahsoudi and Jose Sanchez Marquez,submitted for the Master Course Pavement Design CIVI 6451 (Fall 2013). In addition this project was presented in the 1st Annual MSC-CTRF Transportation Conference at Concordia University.
In this post you are going to find the use of two Non-destructive test (NDT’s) Electrical Resistivity and GWT test to determine durability characteristics of new PCC pavement located in the city of Montreal, Canada.
(Note: the all project is not presented here, only some parts of it. However the final conclusion and references are fully shared).
There are several types of tests that are used to determine important characteristics and properties of Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements before its fabrication, during its transportation and placement. However, once placement takes place, it is difficult to determine if the process of consolidation, finishing and curing were correctly developed. The appearance of cracks after some days or some years, are one of the most common warnings that something had gone wrong.Also, it is well know that deficiencies in pavement thickness reduce the life of the pavement.
Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement is commonly used because of its capability to support compression and tension stresses, making it the first alternative in scenarios where high traffic and heavy loads are predominant.
A durable concrete is not only one that can resist a number of axle loads for a period of time, but it must also have a series of properties for the particular environment in which it is exposed during its service life (Taylor et al., 2013). Concrete durability is generally defined as ability to resist weathering action, chemical attack, abrasion, or any process of concrete deterioration.
In order to achieve durability the concrete must have good quality material, an effective construction control, and consolidation, finishing and curing must guarantee a durable concrete in order to avoid early deterioration and excessive maintenance efforts.
The Non-destructive tests (NDT) durability tests such as Water Absorption and Electrical Resistivity (Wenner probe) can determine the moisture content and permeability of the PCC pavement at an early stage.
Besides, NDT also determines the layer thickness quality assurance in PCC pavements. This method has lower time and cost compared to traditional methods like coring extraction (Maser et al., 2005). The objective of this study is to identify whether NDT tests can be useful for contractors in general or in specific areas. This is done by proving that this approach is a less time consuming and less expensive alternative for monitoring quality assurance control in the different PCC pavements.
In order to establish the pavement layer thickness, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is by far the most established technology (other than coring) for measuring pavement thickness or Mechanical wave techniques, such as impact-echo (IE), that seems to work more effectively in concrete (Maser et al., 2005). The electrical resistance of a hardened concrete can be measured by the by the Wenner - four electrode probe (electrical resistance). This test can be correlated with permeability (Shahroodi et al., 2010).
The reason why the place was chosen at Westmount QC H3Z 2A6 was because during the end of summer 2013 (September) a PCC pavement was placement in this intersection.
Greene Avenue and Boulevard de Maisonneuve, Intersection 1299 Greene Ave Westmount QC H3Z 2A6
The testing date was the 11th October 2013 during the morning, for the two tests, Water Absorption and Wenner four probe were conducted and the weather air and pavements conditions were measured at that date:
Air Temperature: 14 °C
Air Humidity: 72 %
Pavement Temperature: 18.7 °C
Pavement Humidity: 82.3%
The figure bellow shows the intersection location and the street distance between the place and Concordia University.
In order to conduct the test was necessary to saturate with tap water for some minutes the concrete surface where the device is going to be place. For the field test a total time of 1 hour saturation was applied into the surface.
According to the following figure develop at Concordia University from a Master thesis research in progress called “Evaluation of Saturation Techniques for In-situ Surface Electrical Resistivity Measurements” by Dr. Michelle Nokken and Jose Sanchez Marquez. A significant decrease in the resistivity value up to 6 hours is observed but then it became stable (same value). At the end, an average difference of -9.5 % is observed between the first measurement (1 hour) and the last one measurement done at 72 hours.
A total of 24 measurements were done on each slab, 8 measurement at different slab zones (1MS, 2MS and 3MS) in order to obtain a final resistivity value. Figure bellow shows the three locations in where the device was located over the slabs.
The final Average Resistivity Value obtain for the two slabs, 13.6 and 13.4 KΩ-cm. Which means that, the resistivity value and the degree of permeability of the concrete placed at the intersection street and tested for this research work is the one expected in this kind of cement. Moreover, it also means that, for the two slabs tested the placement and curing procedure were good enough, due to the values obtained are similar to the ones obtained at laboratory conditions (ideal conditions).
The Water absorption test was conducted the same day of the Wenner Probe test, the 11th October 2013. The following weather information was measured that day;
Slab No. 01 Temperature: 18.7 °C
Slab No. 02 Temperature: 19.1 °C
Pavement Humidity: 82.3%
Once in the field, over the slab the pressure chamber containing a watertight gasket was secured tightly to the surface by two anchored clamping pliers or by means of a suction plate.
Then the chamber was filled with water and the valves closed. The top lid of the chamber was turned until a desired water pressure is achieved. The pressure selected is maintained by means of a micrometer gauge pressing a piston into the chamber (20 MN), substituting the water penetrating into the material. The travel of the piston over time was used for characterizing the permeation of the surface tested.
According to previous researches it was possible to estimate that a high pressure (permeability) and low pressure (absorption) tests could be done for duration of up to 30 minutes. Based on this results it was concluded that test duration of 20 minutes can provide sufficient number of data points in order to calculate related indices (Basheer et al., 1995). The following table shows the pressure range against test time for the two slabs.
As a result the PCC pavement tested showed a good capability to absorb water.
One of the main factors that are in the service life of new and existing pavement concretes is durability performance and durability is a function of permeability.
In this Paper Term study different types of existing permeability tests were used to evaluate the the durability of the Greene Avenue and Boulevard de Maisonneuve - Intersection, 1299 Greene Ave concret PCC pavement.
The scope of the research included the characterization of fluid transport with two different tests, Wenner Four probe test and water absorption test. Two concrete slabs were tested in this research.
The result of the Electrical Resistivity test indicates that the final resistivity value for Slab No. 01 and Slab No. 2 are 13.4 and 13.6 respectively. If we want to compare these values with 28-Day Surface Resistivity (According to table 1), it shows that the permeability of the mentioned concrete is in the range of moderate permeability class. In addition, for the water absorption according to the results obtained from the test, sorptivity index is around 2.3 for the slab and the humidity and water ratio are 83% and 0.45 respectively, so according to figure 14, Concrete is ranked as a good condition in terms of capability.
Although for this research work we contacted some companies from Montreal and from province of Ontario it was not possible to find and use a GPR or IE device in order to evaluate the thickness at the same place where the other two test were done (intersection Avenue), due to the highly cost of the equipment and also due to their complexity, is necessary to have some hours training before testing in the field. However, we really believed that the use of electrical wave as method to measure pavement thickness is going to be the more efficient, less time and man-hour consuming way to establish thickness.
Conclusions
The results presented in this term paper show the effectiveness of these two methods for determining the permeability and the capability to absorb water. Both identify that, the moderate permeability and good capability to absorb water are the result of a high cement factor, well graded and a low w/c of 0.45. Moreover, a good revibration of the concrete during the placement stage also probably helped to reduce the permeability and eventually when the intersection avenue has to be exposed to deicing salts is going to perform an excellent behave.
Regarding to Non- Destructive Test (NDT) is possible to conclude that, these tests are performed in a manner that does not affect the future usefulness of the object or material. In other words, NDT allows parts and material to be inspected and measured without damaging them. Additionally, NDT provides an excellent balance between quality control and cost-effectiveness. Generally speaking, NDT applies to industrial inspections.
Comparing traditional approaches like core extraction that is a Destructive test and requires more time and resources (money) in comparison with NDT tests.
One disadvantage that we found is that special weather conditions are required in order to do the Water Absorption and Wenner four Probe tests, the temperature should not be below 5°C, what it means that during the winter season is not recommended use these test on outside concrete expose to this weather conditions.
Al-Qadi, I.L., Lahouar, S., Jiang, K., MeGhee, K. and Mokarem, D., Validation of ground penetration radar accuracy for estimating pavement layer thicknesses. Proc. Transp. Res. Board 84th Annu. Meet., pp. 5–2341, January 9–13, Washington, DC 2005.
Applied Research Associates (ARA) (2012) “Transportation Sector Methodology for the Development of Equivalent Pavement Structural Design Matrix for Municipal Roadways- Montréal and Québec City” December 13, 2012
Baroth J., Schoefs F., Breysse D. (2011). Construction reliability. ISTE Ltd – Wiley; p.368.
Basheer, M., Goncalves, A. F., Torrent, R. (2006). Chapter 4. Non-destructive methods to measure water transport. Non-Destructive Evaluation of the Penetrability and Thickness of the Concrete Cover RILEM TC 189-NEC: State-of-the-Art Report.
Castro, J., BENTZ, D. & WEISS, J. 2011. Effect of Sample Conditioning on The Water Absorption Of Concrete. Cement And Concrete Composites, 33, 805-813.
Gibson A., Popovics J. S. (2005) Lamb wave basis for impact-echo method analysis. ASCE J Eng Mech; 131(4):438–43.
Halabe, U., Sotoodehnia, A., Maser, K.R. and Kausel, E.A., Modeling the electromagnetic properties of concrete. ACI Mater. J., 1993, 90(6), 552–563.
Lin, J. M., Streett, W. B., Sansalone, M. A. (1996). A New Procedure for Determining Highway Pavement Thickness Using Surface Wave Speed Measurements and the Impact-Echo Method. Innovations in Nondestructive Testing of Concrete, ACI special publication.
Maser, K. R., T. J. Holland , R. Roberts and J. Popovics (2006). NDE methods for quality assurance of new pavement thickness. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7:1, 1-10, DOI: 10.1080/10298430500501985
Maser, K.R. and Scullion, T., Influence of asphalt layering and surface treatments on asphalt and base layer thickness computations using GPR, 1992a, TTI Report TX-92-1923-1, September 1992.
Maser, K.R., Pavement characterization using ground penetrating radar: State of the art and current practice. In ASTM STP 1375 Nondestructive
Maser, K.R., T. J. Holland , R. Roberts and J. Popovics (2006) NDE methods for quality assurance of new pavement thickness, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7:1, 1-10, DOI: 10.1080/10298430500501985
Morris, W.; Moreno E.I.; and Sagues, A.A., (1996) “Practical Evaluation of Resistivity of Concrete in Test Cylinders using a Wenner Array Probe,” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.26, p.1779-1787.
Nolan, E. A. 1996. Influence of near surface moisture gradients in concrete on'Autoclam'permeation measurements. Queen's University of Belfast.
Prada C., Clorennec D., Royer D. (2008) Power law decay of zero-group velocity lamb modes. Wave Motion; 45(6):723–8.
Proceq test concrete Manual. Available on internet: http://www.proceq.com/fileadmin/documents/proceq/products/Concrete/Resipod/English/resipod_SF_E_2013.06.19_low.pdf
Shahroodi, Ahmad. (2010) “Development of Test Methods for Assessment of Concrete Durability for Use in Performance-Based Specifications” M.A.Sc., Thesis submitted to University of Toronto.
Taylor, P., P. Tennis, K. Obla, P. Ram, T. Van Dam and H. Dylla (2013) “Durability of Concrete”. Transportation Research CIRCULAR E-C171
Testing of Pavements and Back calculation of Moduli, 3, 1999 (American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA)
Wenzlick, J., Scullion, T. and Maser, K.R., High accuracy pavement thickness measurement using ground penetrating radar, 1999, Report No. RDT 99-003, Missouri Dept. of Transportation, February 1999.
Posted in
concrete or asphalt,
Non-destructive test,
PCC pavements,
Quality Assurance
|
Written on Sunday, March 27, 2011 by Jose Sanchez Marquez
There are polarized opinions about what is the best material for highway construction, concrete or pavement. In Colombia, asphalt is the most common way to highway construction. However in the last years concrete highways has been taking place in urban areas.
The most important differences of these two methods are the cost, time of construction, qualified staff, durability and the Island heat effect.
Construction Cost
The first aspect about the cost, it is true that the asphalt has a lower price, due to the structure sub granular base, granular base are not so expensive and they conformed a big important percentage in the thickness structure. In concrete roads is the concrete the one that conformed the majority of the thickness structure, reason why the cost per m3 increase the value of the roadway.
Time of Construction
According with the time of construction in new roadways there are not big differences, every process can consume a similar time of delivering the roadway. However if we are talking about maintenance works with the pavement you can give way to traffic in less time, meanwhile with concrete if it is normal you need to wait at least for 28 days, waiting to reach the final resistance.
Qualified Staff
The qualified staff is very important in pavement process, due to you need to count with people that can operate for instance, a motor grader, a rolling vibratory, drum vibratory rollers a tracked paver or wheeled paver, Pneumatic rollers and trucks that carry the pavement. Also you need to count with a topography team and a specialized people that spread the asphalt and help to give the final look. Concrete process doesn’t require the same number of qualified staff and the maintenance is easier and also don't require specialized machines or people.
As a conclusion we can also said that concrete roadways consume less diesel combustible, according with the American concrete pavement Association, ACPA. An asphalt road requires 4.5 more combustible than a pavement design with concrete for the same number of traffic.
With the durability concrete doesn’t has comparison, the pavement life can be between 7 to 10 years, but with concrete the life expectance is between 20 to 25 years.
Heat Island Effect
However the most important difference is the one that few people stop to analyze, the heat island effect. Due to the cities needs roadways, parking lots and all kind of structures to may our lives easier we are changing the urban sustainability. The zones that were before moist permeable now are waterproof dry and this phenomenon is clearer in warm weather cities.
Image from http://www.acca.it/euleb/en/glossary/index.html
One benefit of use concrete is that it reflects the sunlight helping to reduce the city temperature. In the picture below we can see the differences in temperatures between concrete and asphalt. Concrete has a temperature of 38°C and the asphalt has a temperature of 55°C. Reason that explains why in warm cities is so common the use of air conditioning.

Image from http://www.celsias.com/article/cool-roof-could-offset-carbon-emissions/
We need to remember that when it leaves the asphalt plant has a temperature of (152 –154°C) during the course can it lose (2 - 4°C), when it is spread by the tracked paver, it is necessary to wait until the temperature decrease to (130 – 132°C) and then the drum vibratory rollers and Pneumatic rollers can work on the pavement. Once the process is over the asphalt con reaches easily temperatures of (48–67°C) all year long, transferring excess heat to the air above them and heating storm water as it runs off the pavement into local waterways. Further, concrete temperature when leaves plant is around (30 – 32°C) and during the course can earn (0.5 - 1°C). Once is completely finish in a very hot day can reach a temperature of (36 – 38°C).
As conclusion we can say that Concrete has a higher durability, doesn't need many qualify personnel, doesn't consume the same quantity of combustible and can mitigate in a better way the heat. Asphalt could be not so expensive, doesn’t has the same durability and it is not good in mitigate the heat.
Jose Sanchez Marquez
References.
Posted in
concrete or asphalt,
construcción de vias,
grader,
heavy machines,
highways,
island heat effect
|